Title
Dept/ Agency: Law
Action: ( ) Ratifying (X) Authorizing ( ) Amending
Purpose: Settlement of Civil Litigation
Docket No.: ESX-L-005075-18
Claimant: 192 Doremus, LLC v. Municipal Council of the City of Newark and the Newark Central Planning Board
Claimant's Attorney: Kevin J. Coakley, Esq.
Attorney's Address: Connell Foley, LLP, 56 Livingston Avenue, Roseland, New Jersey 07068
Settlement Amount: N/A
Funding Source: N/A
Account Code Line:
Additional Comments:
body
WHEREAS, the Municipal Council adopted Resolution 7R2-a on January 19, 2017, which authorized the Newark Central Planning Board (the “Board”) to conduct a preliminary investigation of a designated Study Area located at Doremus Avenue (“Study Area”) to determine whether those certain properties located within the Study Area qualify as a “Condemnation Redevelopment Area” pursuant to the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-1 et seq. (“LRHL”); and
WHEREAS, 192 Doremus, LLC (192 Doremus), is the owner of real property known as 192 Doremus Avenue, Newark, New Jersey 07105, and designated as Block 5014, Lot 1 and riparian Lots 1.03 and 1.04 on the Official Tax Map of the City of Newark, New Jersey (collectively referred to as the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Property was included within the Study Area; and
WHEREAS, Topology NJ, LLC, (“Topology”), in cooperation with the City of Newark and the Newark Community Economic Development Corporation, (presently known as “Invest Newark”) conducted a preliminary investigation to determine whether the designation of the Study Area as an area in need of redevelopment is appropriate and in conformance with the statutory criteria set forth in N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-5; and
WHEREAS, the report, prepared by Topology, dated October 6, 2017, and entitled “Doremus Avenue Area in Need of Redevelopment Investigation Report” indicates that, based upon the Property’s inclusion in the Port/Airport Support Zone Scattered Site Study Area, (“Port/Airport Support Zone Area”), and the Municipal Council’s prior designation of the Property as an area in need of redevelopment by Resolution 7R3-a adopted on April 7, 2009 (“2009 Resolution”), the prior designation of the Property by the 2009 Resolution remains valid and no further action is necessary; and
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, and continuing on December 18, 2017, January 8, 2018, January 29, 2018, and March 5, 2018, the Newark Central Planning Board conducted public hearings; and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 2018, the Board voted to recommend that the Study Area be designated by the Municipal Council as an “area in need of redevelopment” with condemnation rights; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution, dated April 23, 2018, the Board memorialized its decision to recommend that the Study Area be designated as an “Condemnation Redevelopment Area”; and
WHEREAS, on June 7, 2018, the Municipal Council adopted Resolution 7R2-d(S), as amended, determining that the Property, among others, qualifies as a “Condemnation Redevelopment Area” pursuant to the LRHL; and
WHEREAS, upon further review of Resolution 7R2-d(S), the Municipal Council adopted Resolution 7R2-a adopted on January 23, 2019, as amended, determining that the Property, among others, qualifies as a Condemnation Redevelopment Area” pursuant to the LRHL; and
WHEREAS, on July 20, 2018, 192 Doremus filed a Complaint Action in Lieu of Prerogative Writs in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, entitled 192 Doremus, LLC v. Municipal Council of the City of Newark and the Newark Central Planning Board, Docket No. ESX-L-005075-18, challenging the Board’s recommendation and the Municipal Council’s subsequent determination that the Property qualifies as a Condemnation Redevelopment Area, pursuant to the LRHL (“192 Doremus Litigation”); and
WHEREAS, the Parties have now reached a settlement of this dispute in order to avoid costly litigation expenses; and
WHEREAS, this Settlement Agreement and General Release neither admits nor should it be construed as an admission of liability or violation of any law, statute or regulation or a breach of any duty by the City of Newark, its agents, officers and/or employees whatsoever and is entered into to resolve this matter and prevent the incurring of additional costs and fees; and
WHEREAS, the City of Newark and its Corporation Counsel have determined that it is in the best interest of the taxpayers to settle and avoid the cost, expense, delay and uncertainty of litigation; and
WHEREAS, the terms of the settlement are set forth in the Settlement Agreement and General Release and does not include any monetary payment on the part of the City to the Plaintiff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, THAT:
1. The Mayor and/or his designee, the Corporation Counsel, is authorized, on behalf of the City of Newark to negotiate and execute a Settlement Agreement and Release, and any other documents, sufficient in form and content to the Corporation Counsel and to take whatever actions are necessary to resolve the matter entitled 192 Doremus, LLC v. Municipal Council of the City of Newark and the Newark Central Planning Board, Docket No. ESX-L-005075-18 and to effectuate the terms of the settlement of this matter pursuant to the terms contained in the within resolution.
2. The Municipal Council authorizes the City of Newark to de-designate the Property and remove same from the Condemnation Redevelopment Area as set forth in Resolution 7R2-a, as amended, on January 23, 2019. In order to effectuate same, a resolution amending Resolution 7R2-a, as amended, shall specifically remove the Property from the Condemnation Redevelopment Area. Said resolution shall also set forth an amendment to Municipal Council Resolution 7R3-a, adopted on April 7, 2009, to remove the Property from the designation as an area in need of redevelopment under the LRHL.
3. In exchange for the execution by 192 Doremus, LLC, of the Settlement Agreement and Release, acceptable in the form to the Corporation Counsel and after passage of this resolution and upon receipt by the Corporation Counsel, within seven (7) calendar days of 192 Doremus, LLC, receipt of the certified copy of the adopted resolution, 192 Doremus, LLC, will dismiss the 192 Doremus, LLC, Litigation, without prejudice and without costs, by filing a Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice.
4. Upon the passage of fifty-five (55) days of the adoption of the resolution, if there have been no legal challenges filed with the court contesting the legality of said resolution, 192 Doremus, LLC, will dismiss the 192 Doremus, LLC, Litigation, with prejudice and without costs, by filing a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice within seven (7) calendar days of the expiration of the fifty-five (55) day period.
5. The settlement and resolution does not admit nor should it be construed as an admission of liability or violation of any law, statute or regulation or a breach of any duty by the City of Newark, its agents, officers and/or employees whatsoever and is entered into based upon recommendations of the Corporation Counsel and to eliminate all risks and future litigation costs.
6. The Corporation Counsel shall file a fully executed copy of the Settlement Agreement and Release in the Office of the City Clerk.
7. This resolution shall be effective upon adoption in accordance with applicable laws of the State of New Jersey.
STATEMENT
This resolution authorizes the Corporation Counsel on behalf of the City of Newark to resolve the pending matter entitled 192 Doremus, LLC v. Municipal Council of the City of Newark and the Newark Central Planning Board, Docket No. ESX-L-005075-18 by executing the Settlement Agreement and General Release without the need and expense of future litigation. This resolution does not include any monetary payment on the part of the City of Newark to the Plaintiff.